This is the text of a lecture I gave at the University of South Wales Chaplaincy to launch my book 'Sing Out for Justice: The Poetry and Passion of the Hebrew Prophets' on 29th
November 2017
If you were
looking for a factual historical answer, you would of course say they were
Jews. But in fact this would not be quite correct. The word ‘Jew’ comes from
the name of the tribe of Judah, who was a great-grandson of Abraham. This means
that Abraham was not a Jew: he was called a Hebrew, a nomad from what is now
Iraq. He had two sons, Ishmael – the ancestor of the Arabs – and Isaac. Isaac’s
son Jacob was also called ‘Israel’, so his descendants were the Israelites, or
‘children of Israel’. One of his twelve sons was Judah, and his descendants are the
Jews. So, for instance, the prophets Moses, Miriam, Deborah, Elijah and Elisha
were Israelites, but they were not Jews.
To cut
a long, complicated history short, the kingdom of Israel with its twelve tribes
was eventually reduced to virtually the one tribe of Judah. And so all the
Israelites who were left were ‘Jews’.
But of
course my intention is not to answer the question literally. When the Jews
became consolidated as a religious community with a faith we now call Judaism,
they preserved, edited and gathered together the words of all the prophets,
which became part of the Jewish Scriptures. In that sense all the prophets are Jews.
The Jewish Scriptures were adopted by Christians as their ‘Old Testament’, so
that the prophets are part of Christian history and their books are part of the
Christian Bible. Later, many of these prophets came to be mentioned in the
Qur'an, so that their story and their preaching are part of the Muslim faith
too.
This
means we could answer the question ‘were the prophets Jews, Christians or
Muslims?’ by saying ‘all three’. They are an essential element in the three
Abrahamic faiths. Each one of these faiths has claimed the prophets as its own,
but they see their significance in different ways. I want to look first at
these three different understandings of the prophets.
The Jewish View
In
Judaism the Prophets are one of the three divisions of Scripture. The Jews
often call the Scriptures the ‘tanak’. This is an acronym based on the Hebrew
words for Law, Prophets and Writings (Torah, Nebi'im, Kethubim).
The Law
(Torah) is basic. It consists of the first five books, those that are called the
‘books of Moses’: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Orthodox
Jews believe that this Torah is an eternal divine entity given by God to Moses
on Mount Sinai. The role of the prophets was to comment on it and reinforce it.
In the Jewish Scriptures the ‘Prophets’ include the history books of Joshua,
Judges, Samuel and Kings. These are not history in the modern, secular sense.
They are not written simply to satisfy people’s curiosity. Nor are they
patriotically motivated, to boost up the nation by telling its story. They are
the story of God's dealings with his people, told from the point of view of the
prophets. In a sense, they are sermons illustrated by history.
The
Jewish Scriptures present the prophets as people who have a special
relationship with God: people who are, as it were, taken into God's confidence.
They receive a message to pass on to the people. The message is not the whole
teaching of religion, but a specific message for the time and circumstances. It
can be a prediction or warning addressed to an individual, but more often it is
addressed to the whole nation through its leaders. The prophets are a vital
link in the covenant relationship between God and the people of Israel.
They do
not merely pass on what God tells them: they sometimes argue with God and have
an influence on his decisions. One classic account of this is in a story about
Abraham (Gen 18). God has seen the wickedness of the city of Sodom and resolved
to destroy it, but he says to himself: ‘I will not hide from Abraham what I am
going to do …’, and so he tells him. But then Abraham asks God: what if not all the people
of Sodom are deserving of punishment? If, for instance, there are fifty
righteous men in the city, will God destroy the righteous along with the
wicked? God responds by promising that he will spare the whole city if he finds
fifty righteous men in it. Then Abraham asks: what if there are only forty-five?
This leads on to a conversation that sounds very much like the traditional
haggling in an oriental market. What if there are only forty? Or twenty? Or
ten? When Abraham has ‘beaten him down’ to ten, God walks away: that is his
final offer. From the story that follows, it seems there were not even ten.
It is
interesting to note that in the course of this argument Abraham appeals to God
to be true to himself: ‘Should not the Judge of all the earth do right?’ Political
campaigners often use this kind of technique. They challenge their government
to act according to the constitution, or to live up to the best traditions and
ideals of the nation. This is what Abraham is doing here, and some of the other
prophets did it as well: challenging God to live up to his declared nature. This
dynamic relationship of the prophets with God comes out in the portrayal of
Moses, in which God does actually yield to persuasion. It is a feature of the
book of Jeremiah and some of the others too. And so behind these conversations
there is the earnest quest of the Jewish people to understand what is good and
just.
In
Judaism the prophets are seen as people very close to God, but they were not
perfect, sinless people. They had their times of doubt, and sometimes God
rebuked them for their mistakes or lack of faith. It is important to note too
that not all the prophets were male. Miriam, Deborah and Huldah are mentioned
as prophets.
In
Jewish thinking the age of prophecy ended with Malachi, the last book in the ‘Prophets’
collection, and incidentally the last book of the Christian Old Testament. Jews
believe so strongly in the supremacy of the Torah that sometimes they say that Moses
knew beforehand what all the prophets were going to say. In other words, the prophets
were drawing out messages that were already in the Torah received by Moses but not
written. And so there can be no contradiction between the Torah and the
Prophets.
The Christian View
Christianity
began as a movement within Judaism. In the first century AD the Jews were
talking a lot about the coming of the Messiah, or 'Anointed One', the new David
who was going to set the Jewish people free from their oppressors and bring in
the Kingdom of God. The followers of Jesus believed he was the Messiah. In fact
the title 'Christ' is the Greek equivalent of ‘Messiah’, which means 'anointed'.
In a sense Christianity began as an argument among the Jews as to whether Jesus
was the Messiah or not. The early Christians searched the Jewish Scriptures for
all the evidence they could find to back up their claim.
This is
well illustrated in the story of Jesus, after the resurrection, talking with
two of his disciples on the road to Emmaus, when he ‘explained to them what was
said about himself in all the Scriptures, beginning with the books of Moses and
the writings of all the prophets’ (Luke 24:27). The Apostle Paul at one point repeats
what was already a kind of Christian ‘creed’: ‘I passed on to you what I
received, which is of the greatest importance: that Christ died for our sins,
as written in the Scriptures; that he was buried and that he was raised to life
three days later, as written in the Scriptures . . .’ (1 Cor 15:3-4)
The
early Christians saw the proof that Jesus was the Messiah in the way he fulfilled
the predictions of Scripture. This led to the traditional Christian perception
of the prophets that sees their main function, if not their only function, as
pointing forward to Jesus. The favourite Old Testament book for the early
Christians - the one most frequently mentioned in the New Testament - was
Isaiah. It is interesting that the prophet Isaiah is one of those not mentioned
at all in the Qur'an. For Christians the book of Isaiah is important because it
is has the largest number of passages that Christians have interpreted as predicting
Christ. It gives us:
·
the
virgin conceiving and bearing a child (Isa 7)
·
the Son
born to us who will be called Almighty God and Prince of Peace (Isa 9)
·
the voice
crying in the wilderness who foreshadows John the Baptist (Isa 40)
·
the
Servant who would bring light to all the nations (Isa 42 and 49) and would be
wounded for our transgressions (Isa 53), and so on.
Some
Christian commentators have labelled Isaiah ‘the Fifth Gospel’, because it
seems to be all about Jesus.
This perspective
on the prophets comes out in the difference between the Jewish Bible and the Christian
Old Testament. In a sense they are the same - they contain the same books. But
the books are in a different order. In the Jewish tanak, the Torah comes first, then the Prophets, and then various
other books that are called the ‘Writings’. The Christian Old Testament also
starts with the Torah, but then it lumps all the historical books together,
whether they belong to the ‘Prophets’ or to the ‘Writings’. Then come the
poetic and philosophical books, and finally the Prophets. It looks as if
Christianity has reshaped the Jewish Bible as an arrow to point to Christ.
The Muslim View
Prophecy is more central to Islam than it is to either
of the other faiths. For the Jews, Torah is central, and the Prophets comment
on it. For Christians, Jesus Christ is central, and the prophets point to him. But
for Islam prophecy is in a sense the whole content of the faith. The Qur'an consists
entirely of revelations to a prophet. The basic confession of the Muslim faith
is, ‘There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger’, and the title
given to Muhammad is ‘Prophet’.
There are 25 prophets mentioned in the Qur’an. Some
of them are recognised Hebrew prophets like Abraham, Moses, Elijah, Elisha,
Jonah and Zechariah. Others are mentioned in the Bible but not called prophets:
e.g., Adam, Noah, Lot, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Aaron, David, Solomon and Job. Two of them, John the Baptist and Jesus, are in the New
Testament. The Qur'an also mentions other prophets without naming them.
Interestingly, it does not mention some of the most prominent prophets in the
Bible such as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Hosea and Amos.
Muslims
believe that Muhammad is ‘the seal of the prophets’, the final one. They
believe that each of the earlier prophets was sent to a specific people for a
specific time, but Muhammad's message is for the whole of humanity for all time.
Muslims respect other Scriptures, but believe that where they differ from the
Qur’an they have been corrupted. Muslims believe that the prophets were perfect
in their lives, free of all sin. They all preached the same message: the
oneness of God, charity, prayer, pilgrimage, worship of God, fasting and the
judgment. This means that from the Muslim point of view all the prophets were
Muslims.
To
complete the record we should mention the other, much younger, prophetic faith,
that of the Bahai's. This religion came out of Islam in the 19th century. It
differs from Islam chiefly in having a wider view of God's messengers, not
confined within the Abrahamic succession. Baha'is believe that people such as
Krishna, the Buddha and Zoroaster were part of the succession of special
messengers through whom God has revealed himself to the human race. It is a
kind of progressive revelation or step-by-step education of humanity. The
latest messenger is Baha'ullah. He is not the final one, but he is the last one
we will hear, because the next one will not appear for another thousand years.
And so
we may answer the question ‘Are the Prophets Jews, Christians or Muslims?’ by
saying ‘all three, and in a sense Bahai’s as well’.
An Alternative View
But I
would also want to say that there is a sense in which they are ‘none of the
above’. After all, in the lifetime of the prophets themselves none of those
classifications existed. They lived in a culture that pre-dates them all. They
would not have known that the words they preached to specific people in their
own time would one day be part of the Holy Scriptures of three worldwide
religions. They had their own issues to deal with, and their own things to say.
The
understanding of the Bible, and indeed the Christian faith itself, has been
deeply influenced by modern scientific methods of study. Scholars study the
Bible as they would any other set of ancient writings. Historians and
archaeologists compare it with other evidence from the same historical period. They
also read ‘between the lines’ in the text itself, trying to work out how it was
put together and what the original authors meant to say. Not all Christian
believers are happy with this approach. They think it goes against reverence
for the Bible as Holy Scripture. But what this reverence means in practice is
reading into the Bible what we have traditionally been taught, trying to make
it fit in with orthodox belief and turning a blind eye to the bits that don’t
fit in. The modern way of reading is much more realistic, and in my opinion
more respectful. It means looking honestly for the truth, and taking the Bible seriously
rather than literally. With this
approach we notice things we did not notice before, and we can hear the
individual voices of the prophets in their own lifetime and situation. To me,
this brings the Bible to life and is far more interesting, inspiring and in the
end challenging.
Take
for instance the prophecy of Isaiah that we always read at Christmas carol
services and hear in Handel's Messiah:
‘Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name
Immanuel’ (Isa 7:14). We usually just hear that one verse, which is quoted in
the New Testament (Matt 1:23) as a prophecy of the birth of Jesus. But if we read
the whole story in Isaiah from the beginning of the chapter, we get a different
picture. Isaiah was speaking to Ahaz, the king of Judah. The people were in a
state of panic because two of the neighbouring kingdoms were threatening to
invade. Isaiah was urging the king to keep calm and not let himself be drawn
into any foolish strategy. In order to reinforce his point he made a specific
prediction. A young woman is pregnant, he said, and her son will be called
Immanuel, which means ‘God is with us’. We do not know who this young woman was:
it could be Isaiah’s wife, or a member of the royal family. The prediction is
that by the time this child is old enough to know good from bad the whole
situation will have been transformed, and the threat from those two kingdoms will
be no more. It’s not quite clear what he meant by knowing good from bad. It
could be, as one translation puts it, knowing right from wrong, in which case
the child might be at least a few years old. On the other hand, it could be
more immediate than that. As soon as a child is weaned and begins to eat food,
that child knows what it likes and what it doesn’t like. But whichever it
means, Isaiah was obviously not talking about a child who was going to be born
700 years later. That would have meant nothing to the people he was talking to,
and would have given them no comfort or challenge.
Matthew’s
Gospel in the New Testament takes up these words as a supernatural prediction
that Jesus would be born of a virgin. This is based partly on an ambiguity in
the meaning of a word. The Hebrew word generally means a young woman, but the early
Christians mostly read the Scriptures in Greek, and the Greek word specifically
means ‘virgin’. It is quite reasonable to say that the ancient words of the
prophet Isaiah have acquired a new meaning, but that is not the same as saying
that the main point Isaiah was making at the time was a prediction of the birth
of Jesus.
We
often think of a ‘prophet’ as someone who predicts the future, but this was not
the main function of the biblical prophets. They weren't like Nostradamus or
Old Moore's Almanac. Admittedly, there was a category of people who specialised
in clairvoyance or soothsaying, but the classical prophets - the ones who have
books in the Bible named after them - were generally nothing like that. Any
predictions they made came either out of their good judgment or out of their
faith. Like many wise politicians or journalists today, they could see more
clearly than others the way things were going and what the outcome would be. But
for the prophets it was not just a matter of political experience or judgment. It
was their faith that inspired what they said. This faith told them that wrong
actions would inevitably lead to disastrous consequences, but doing right and trusting
God would always be the best policy in the long term.
The
prophets were poets. Most of their books are in poetic form. They were also
singers. In Isaiah there is a chapter (Ch 5) that starts: ‘I will sing for my
beloved a song concerning his vineyard …’ In that culture vineyards and grapes had the
kind of association that ‘June’ and ‘moon’ have today. Hear ‘beloved’ and
‘vineyard’, and immediately people would think, ‘Here comes a love song’. The
song goes on to describe the care the singer’s ‘beloved’ took with his
vineyard: preparing the ground, planting choice vines and preparing the vat to
store the grapes. But the produce is disappointing. The grapes are useless for
making wine – no better than wild grapes. He becomes angry at his vineyard: he
threatens to take away its hedge and leave it defenceless, to be overgrown with
briers and thorns, and even to command the clouds not to rain on it. This is
obviously not just a story about the cultivation of grapes. It is the
passionate outburst of a spurned lover. But then it moves into yet another
dimension. The tone becomes grimmer. The singer points out that the vineyard is
the nation and the vine grower is God. The image of Israel as a vine or a
vineyard was also well known. The singer now spells out what the bad fruit is:
‘he
expected justice,
but saw
bloodshed;
righteousness,
but
heard a cry!’
In the
original Hebrew there is a dramatic juxtaposition of similar words: ‘justice’
is mishpat, ‘bloodshed’ is mishpach; ‘righteousness’ is tsedakah and ‘a cry’ is tse’aqah, a harsh guttural
word to end what started as a sweet love song. This is a protest song. Isaiah today
would be playing a guitar.
The
prophets were protesters and demonstrators. Their concerns were very much the
same as the concerns of protesters and demonstrators today: poverty, injustice,
exploitation, lack of care for the vulnerable, the extravagant military
ambitions of national leaders, and religious hypocrisy. All these issues come
up in their books.
Listen
to Isaiah talking about the rich women of his time. One can’t help feeling that
he was a bit of a misogynist:
‘Look
how proud the women of Jerusalem are! They walk along with their noses in the
air. They are always flirting. They take dainty little steps, and the bracelets
on their ankles jingle … A day is coming when the LORD will take away from the
women of Jerusalem everything they are so proud of – the ornaments they wear on
their ankles, on their heads, on their necks and on their wrists. He will take
away their veils and their hats; the magic charms they wear on their arms and
at their waists; the rings they wear on their fingers and in their noses; all
their fine robes, gowns, cloaks and purses; their revealing garments, their
linen handkerchiefs, and the scarves and long veils they wear on their heads. Instead
of using perfumes, they will stink; instead of fine belts, they will wear
coarse ropes; instead of having beautiful hair, they will be bald; instead of
fine clothes, they will be dressed in rags; their beauty will be turned to
shame!’ (Isa 3:16-24)
Isaiah
was making a serious point about the gross inequality and injustice in the
society of his time, but we can imagine that he rather enjoyed cooking up this
piece of satire. This is the kind of thing that makes the Bible fun!
The
prophets were particularly angry about the way the people flocked to the temple
for religious worship and ritual and thought they were pleasing God, while they
were promoting injustice and mistreating their neighbours. They made it quite clear
what they believed God’s priorities to be. Listen to Amos:
‘The
LORD says, ‘I hate, I despise your festivals, and I take no delight in your
solemn assemblies … Take away from me the noise of your songs; I will not
listen to the melody of your harps. But let justice roll down like waters, and
righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.’ (Amos 5:21-24)
In
those days just as much as today, people’s thoughts would wander during
worship. Amos could read their real thoughts:
‘You
say to yourselves, “We can hardly wait for the holy days to be over so that we
can sell our corn. When will the Sabbath end, so that we can start selling
again? Then we can overcharge, use false measures, and tamper with the scales
to cheat our customers. We can sell worthless wheat at a high price We’ll find
a poor man who can’t pay his debts … and we’ll buy him as a slave.’…”’ (Amos
8:5-6). This somehow reminds me of things like Black Friday or the Boxing Day
sales.
Or
Isaiah again:
‘When
you lift your hands in prayer, I will not look at you. No matter how much you
pray, I will not listen, for your hands are covered with blood. Wash yourselves
clean. Yes, stop doing evil and learn to do right. See that justice is done –
help those who are oppressed, give orphans their rights, and defend widows.’
(Isa 1:15-17)
Like
many poets, the prophets could have nightmare visions. Listen to this passage
from Jeremiah that sounds almost like the aftermath of a nuclear war or an
ecological disaster:
‘I looked
at the earth – it was a barren waste; at the sky – there was no light. I looked
at the mountains – they were shaking, and the hills were rocking to and fro. I
saw that there were no people; even the birds had flown away. The fertile land
had become a desert; its cities were in ruins …’ (Jer 4:23-26)
But
they also had inspiring dreams:
‘They
will hammer their swords into ploughs and their spears into pruning-knives.
Nations will never again go to war, never prepare for battle again. Everyone
will live in peace among his own vineyards and fig-trees, and no one will make
him afraid.’ (Micah 4:1-4)
Then
there is that lovely vision in the book of Isaiah about the prophet’s own city
of Jerusalem:
‘The
new Jerusalem I make will be full of joy, and her people will be happy … There
will be no weeping there, no calling for help. Babies will no longer die in
infancy, and all people will live out their life span. Those who live to be a
hundred will be considered young … People will build houses and live in them
themselves – they will not be used by someone else. They will plant vineyards
and enjoy the wine – it will not be drunk by others …’ (Isa 65:17-25)
What a
vision for the world we still live in today! No more lives cut short by poverty
or violence, no more evictions, no more people robbed of their land by
developers, or having their homes destroyed by bombing, no more people working in
terrible conditions to provide luxury goods for others. The prophets can hold
before us the hope of a fairer society not just in one city or one country but
everywhere.
The
prophets could also be demonstrators. They used what we today would call ‘street
theatre’. Isaiah at one time went around barefoot with his buttocks exposed to
show the privation that was going to come (Isa 20). Ezekiel did all sorts of
peculiar things – lying on his side for days on end, cutting off his hair and
doing strange symbolic things with it, digging a hole in the wall of his house
and so on (Ezek 4-5 etc) – in order to warn people that Jerusalem would fall
and her people would be deported.
Sometimes
the prophets demonstrated in ways that directly affected their own lives.
Ezekiel’s wife died, and he showed no sign of mourning because he wanted to
drive it home to people that death would come to the nation with no chance to
mourn (Ezek 24:15-18). Jeremiah said that God told him not to marry at all, so
that he could show his conviction that disaster was coming (Jer 16:1-4). On the
positive side, when the disaster came and the kingdom of Judah was destroyed by
the Babylonians and the people exiled, Jeremiah bought a bit of his ancestral
land and hid the deeds, showing his confidence that one day things would be
back to normal (Jer 32:6-15).
Hosea is
one of the most remarkable of the books of the prophets. It says that God told Hosea
to marry a prostitute. We don't know whether he actually heard a voice telling
him to do that. It could be that Hosea's wife just turned out to be persistently
unfaithful, and that in looking back he realised it was meant to be. Either
way, Hosea's message was that his tormented relationship with his wife was a
reflection of God's relationship with Israel - a tug of war between anger at
their unfaithfulness and the love that made him want to forgive. Hosea gives us
a rare and moving picture of the pain in the heart of God.
So the
prophets were men and women of their own time, angry and tender, warning or
promising, distressed or joyful, all according to the situation and their own
personality. They lived in the thick of the issues of their time, admired by
some and abused and persecuted by others. Elijah had to flee for his life.
Jeremiah was despised as a traitor and imprisoned for a while. Ezekiel was
probably regarded as a madman. He probably was slightly mad, but he was right
about some things. There was constant conflict between 'true prophets' and
'false prophets', and it was often hard to tell the difference. Only time would
show who was right.
Jesus
was well within the tradition of the prophets. His preaching could be tender
and angry, serious and humorous. Like the prophets, he expressed his message in
action – healing the sick, befriending outcasts – and we could say that his
death on the cross was the supreme act of prophetic symbolism, demonstrating
with his own life the infinite self-giving love of God.
Who are the prophets for our time?
As a 21st
century Christian, I do not see ‘the prophets’ as a set group of people who
lived a long time ago. I believe that God still speaks. And just as the
prophets in their time were controversial figures not accepted by everybody, so
today God can speak through unexpected and people and sometimes through
despised people. The prophets for our time can be campaigners, popular singers
and songwriters singing out their anger about injustice, poverty, war and
violence, challenging the accepted values of the world and imagining a world
that can be different. Perhaps sometimes even politicians can be prophets! Religion
thinks of the prophets as respectable teachers of an unchanging truth, but
actually they were passionate people, controversial, ahead of their time,
shocking some people while they inspired others. They were constantly reinterpreting
the religious tradition and sometimes contradicting those who had gone before
them. They were embroiled in the difficult and divisive issues of their time. And
they were not always right! They were human beings who made mistakes. There are
even examples in the Bible of prophecies that turned out to be incorrect.
So among
the prophets today I believe there are some who are Jews, some who are
Christians and some who are Muslims. But there are some who are of other faiths
and some who do not fit any religious category and cannot be confined to any
box. They are people of all kinds who have the vision and the courage to ‘sing
out for justice’. They are not just traditional religious teachers reinforcing
what people already believe. Prophets are flesh and blood human beings living
in the world, in the heart of its suffering and conflict. They take sides, and
to take sides is to take risks. They are controversial characters, often mocked
and persecuted. But the great thing about prophets is that they preach hope. They may not be infallible, and
they may not be realistic, but they hold before us the possibility that there is another way.