Here is the gist of a sermon I preached recently.
I read from Isaiah, chapter 5: "Let me sing for my beloved a love song concerning his vineyard ..."
This passage starts like a love song. Even “vineyard” in the Old Testament culture
had associations with romantic love. The tone makes it obvious that it is not
just about an agricultural failure, The vineyard owner is not trying to analyse
what went wrong – he is angry with the vineyard. He even wants to command the
clouds to stop raining on it! This is obviously the song of a spurned lover. But
then it takes another turn: “For the
vineyard of the LORD of hosts is the house of Israel”. It is not just a
love song – it is an indictment of the whole nation. “Vine” was also a symbol
of Israel.
The end of the song
is shocking and stark: “He expected justice (mishpat) but saw bloodshed (mishpach), righteousness
(tsedakah), but heard a cry
(tse’aqah).”
We do not often
think of the prophets as singers, but they probably delivered many of their
messages as songs. They were certainly poets. Their books too are
like an anthology: we shouldn’t expect to be able to read the"m from beginning to
end and follow a plot. It’s best to dip in and read one short passage at a
time.
Poets are sensitive
people who feel things very deeply. They have visions we think are unrealistic,
nightmares we would rather not think about. Their logic is sometimes difficult
to understand, but we can feel the passion of what they say. Their anger was
not grim, puritanical “righteousness”: it was the anger we see today in
demonstrators, marchers and protest singers. They were controversial, often
mocked, imprisoned or even executed.
They were dreamers.
The Book of Isaiah begins with the words “The
vision …”. He and the other prophets
could have said “I have a dream”. Martin Luther King was a preacher. His message
was the dream of a world that could be different. It led him into political
engagement and into death. Yet that dream has begun to come true.
We think of the
prophets as predictors of the future. In a sense they were, but only because
they saw deeply into the present time. Their messages were for their own time. Isa 7:14-15 is
about a child who is about to be born and named “God with us” in confidence of
a better time to come.
Isa 9:6-7 is the
celebration of a royal birth. The prophet is perhaps acting in the role of a
Poet Laureate. The grandiose titles "Mighty God", "Prince of Peace" etc., were normal for kings in that culture. Isa 40: 3 is about
the imminent return of the exiles from Babylon across the desert to Jerusalem.
These sayings
acquired new meaning in new situations. But we do the prophet an injustice if
we think he was only making some sort of magical prediction that would mean
nothing to anybody till 700 years later.
The best way to
read the prophets is:
- don’t try to understand everything
- don’t try to square it all with Christian
doctrine
- don’t feel you have to read it all
- read what inspires you, give other passages a
try, but treat it like an anthology of poetry
- read it aloud
- enter into the passion
- try to imagine the story behind it
How can we say that
the Old Testament prophets are not relevant today?